Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rowder v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2026cv02513
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Rowder
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lauda v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv05008
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Lauda
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Noseworthy v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.
as 1:2026cv06527
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Noseworthy
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Cantrell v. United States of America
as 26-1933
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS JAMES CANTRELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Spry v. Jordan
as 5:2026ct03090
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Spry
Defendant:
Reginald Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchem v. City of Middletown, Ohio et al
as 1:2026cv00298
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Mitchem
Defendant:
City of Middletown, Ohio, Officer B. Singleton, Steven P. Longworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchem v. City of Middletown, Ohio et al
as 1:2026cv00299
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Mitchem
Defendant:
City of Middletown, Ohio, Officer Owen Bullard, Steven P. Longworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boan v. Columbia Regional Care Center/Recovery et al
as 9:2026cv00876
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Boan
Defendant:
Columbia Regional Care Center/Recovery, Erin Gaffney and Michael Otruba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv00759
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Martin
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Koch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv06144
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Koch
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
