Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Thomas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Shawn Randall Thomas
Defendant:
City of New York, Eric Leroy Adams, Keechant Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Elam Family v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2017cv01790
Plaintiff:
The Elam Family
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Thomas L. Day, Jr., Susan K. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie Willis v. Kate Barkman, et al
as 17-1472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATE BARKMAN, Department of Court Records, Wills/Orphans' Court Division, PROTHONOTARY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Court of Common Pleas Orphans' Court Division, JUDGE KATHLEEN DURKIN, Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, Orphans' Court Division and others
Leslie Willis v. Kate Barkman, et al
as 17-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATE BARKMAN, Department of Court Records, Wills/Orphans' Court Division, PROTHONOTARY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, Court of Common Pleas Orphans' Court Division, JUDGE KATHLEEN DURKIN, Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, Orphans' Court Division and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01553
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Juliana, et al v United States of America, et al
as 6:2015cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jaime B., Nathaniel B., Victoria B. and others
Defendant:
Ashton Carter, Shaun Donovan, Anthony Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
