Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Garner v. Bunning
as 5:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Nicholis Corey Garner
Defendant:
Hon. Judge David L. Bunning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholis Garner v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 21-14518
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLIS COREY GARNER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Garner v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2021cv00609
Petitioner:
Nicholis Corey Garner
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Nicholas Garner
as 21-5140
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS COREY GARNER, aka Frank Marten, aka Clark David Thomson, aka Wallace Steeves, aka Neal Marion, aka Ronald Peterson, aka Patrick Steele, aka Nicholis Corey Garner
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nicholas Garner v. USA
as 20-5220
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS COREY GARNER, Frank Marten, Clark David Thomson, Wallace Steeves, Neal Marion, Ronald Peterson, Patrick Steele, Nicholis Corey Garner
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nicholas Garner v. USA
as 20-5196
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS COREY GARNER, aka Frank Marten, aka Clark David Thomson, aka Wallace Steeves, aka Neal Marion, aka Ronald Peterson, aka Patrick Steele, aka Nicholis Corey Garner
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Nicholas Garner
as 19-5735
Defendant / Appellant:
NICHOLAS COREY GARNER, aka Frank Marten, aka Clark David Thomson, aka Wallace Steeves, aka Neal Marion, aka Ronald Peterson, aka Patrick Steele, aka Nicholis Corey Garner
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GARNER v. SMITH
as 1:2019cv02072
Plaintiff:
NICHOLIS COREY GARNER
Defendant:
BRADLEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. United States Probation Department
as 5:2019cv00181
Defendant:
United States Probation Department
Plaintiff:
Nicholis Corey Garner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
