Cases 41 - 50 of 135
Banks v. Richardson et al
as 5:2018ct03299
Defendant:
Captain Richardson, Racheal Eley, Mr. Sledge and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00344
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
JOY T NICHOLS and Joy T. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 9.831 Acres, +/-, in Wilson County, NC, PIN 2772-25-9316.000, Described as Tract 2 in a Deed from Lawton E. Nichols to Zilphia H. Nichols, Dated 6/23/2000 Recorded at Vol. 1768, P. 684; et al
as 5:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
9.831 Acres, +/-, in Wilson County, NC, PIN 2772-25-9316.000, Described as Tract 2 in a Deed from Lawton E. Nichols to Zilphia H. Nichols, Dated Recorded at Vol. 1768, P. 684; and Zilphia H. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Nichols v. USA
as 3:2018cv00254
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jason Obrian Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nichols v. Smith
as 5:2018hc02119
Petitioner:
Stacy Tyree Nichols
Respondent:
Donna M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDaniel v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools et al
as 3:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Patricia Falk and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
NICHOLS v. SMITH
as 1:2018cv00261
Petitioner:
STACY TYREE NICHOLS
Respondent:
DONNA M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bailey v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Ebony Nichole Bailey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Uzzell v. Murray et al
as 5:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
Timothy Uzzell
Defendant:
FNU Murray, FNU Nichols, FNU Daves and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
