Cases 11 - 20 of 178
Lucas v. RSAT Program/Jail Post Office et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
James T. Lucas
Defendant:
RSAT Program/Jail Post Office, RSAT Program Director, St. Mary Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laufert et al v. Davis Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kandi Laufert, Estate of Nichole Ashley Laufert and Nichole Ashley Laufert
Defendant:
Davis Logistics, LLC, Stephan Rogian, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. doing business as Ryder Truck and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Lucas v. RSAT Program et al
as 5:2021cv00194
Plaintiff:
James Tyrell Lucas
Defendant:
RSAT Program, RSAT Program Director, St. Mary Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Davis-Stuart, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Anethra Coleman, Anthony Dalmer, Scott Brewer and others
Defendant:
Davis-Stuart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Fields et al v. King et al
as 2:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Melissa Fields and Michael A. Nichols
Defendant:
Roane County Commission, Sheriff L. Todd Cole and Deputy Sheriff Michael King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. First Bank of Ohio
as 2:2019cv00798
Plaintiff:
Nichole D. Ellis
Defendant:
First Bank of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Nichols v. King
as 2:2019cv00563
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
Timothy King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Comer et al
as 2:2019cv00388
Defendant:
Ronnie J. Drake, Robert M. Mefford and Joseph M. Comer
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nichols v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00252
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Nichols
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
