Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
MACK-TANSMORE v. MR. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00689
Defendant: S.P. GREEN, MR. JONES, MS. QUINN and others
Plaintiff: HASHEAM MACK-TANSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. LINK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv04481
Defendant: CYNTHIA LINK, MS. SASSANO, PETER SAAVADA and others
Plaintiff: DENNIS COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLAH v. FERGUSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv04133
Defendant: LT. TAYLOR, LT. NICKLESON, SGT. AGULAR and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MALIK ALLAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hornback v. Nickleson et al
as 1:2018cv04485
Plaintiff: Brandon Hornback
Defendant: Warden Nickleson, Schroder, Pace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Nickleson et al
as 1:2018cv04318
Plaintiff: Jermaine Brooks
Defendant: Nickleson, Jane / John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE-JONES v. CAPOZZI et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Plaintiff: AKEEM PAGE-JONES
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT LANEL CAPOZZI, DEPUTY NICKELSON, LT. ALBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Richard Nickleson
as 17-40558
Movant: In re: RICHARD NICKLESON
Crumedy v. Abangan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00107
Plaintiff: Robert Lynn Crumedy
Defendant: Roland Abangan, Unknown Little, Unknown Vinder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Nickleson v. William Stephens, Director We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-41313
Petitioner - Appellant: RICHARD NICKLESON
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Nickleson v. Bobby
as 3:2013cv00609
Petitioner: Roland Nickleson
Respondent: Warden Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?