Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Martinez v. Hughes
as 4:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nicolas B Martinez
Defendant:
Shay J Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Hughes
as 3:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Nicolas B Martinez
Defendant:
Shay J Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez Martinez vs. Brickell 305 LLC et al
as 1:2021cv20196
Plaintiff:
NICOLAS SANCHEZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
RENATO VIOLA, BRICKELL 305 LLC doing business as MISTER O1 EXTRAORDINARY PIZZA and Brickell 305 LLC doing business as Mister 01 Extraordinary Pizza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Ayala-Tovar et al v. Jeffrey C. Lee Farms, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Bernardo Perez and Jeffrey C. Lee Farms, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Juarez-Martinez, Pablo de Jesus Campos-Godines, Enrique Valerio-Naranjo and others
Herrera v. Navarro et al
as 2:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Raymunda D. Herrera
Defendant:
Nicolas A. Martinez and Rolando V. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nicolas Martinez v. Reid Muataugh, et al
as 13-1621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLAS B. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
REID MUATAUGH, Prosecuting Attorney, DONALD L. DANIEL, Tippecanoe County Judge and STATE OF INDIANA
Nicolas Martinez v. Jon Phillip
as 13-1618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLAS B. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JON P. PHILLIPS
Martinez v. Reid D Muataugh et al
as 4:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Bernardo Martinez
Defendant:
Reid D Muataugh, Donald Daniel and Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v Phillips
as 4:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Bernardo Martinez
Defendant:
Jon P Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
