Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Christensen v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Nicole Danielle Christensen
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bates v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01053
Petitioner:
Nicole Danielle Bates
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Heather Mueller, et al v. Sylacauga Housing Authority
as 22-13663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEATHER MUELLER, NICOLE DANIELS and DANIELL WOMACK
Defendant / Appellee:
SYLACAUGA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Daniels v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
as 5:2022cv10203
Plaintiff:
Nicole Daniels
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Nicole Daniels
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
USA v. Daniels
as 21-50024
Defendant / Appellant:
Ashley Nicole Daniels
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
JACOBS et al v. BAY COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 5:2021cv00001
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE JAIL DIVISION, BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TOMMY FORD and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE JACOBS, SR. and MATTHEW SHANE JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv42590
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DANIELLE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORAVA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv19656
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DANIELLE MORAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mueller et al v. Sylacauga Housing Authority
as 1:2020cv00029
Plaintiff:
Heather Mueller, Daniell Womack and Nicole Daniels
Defendant:
Sylacauga Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
