Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv08241
Plaintiff:
Nikki A Allen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01960
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tanya Kach v. St Mortiz Security Ser Inc
as 08-3921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANYA NICOLE KACH, AKA Nikki Diane Allen
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MCKEESPORT, Both Chief, McKeesport Police and McKeesport School Board Member, E. MICHAEL ELIAS, Both Chief, McKeesport Police and McKeesport School Board Member, TOM CARTER, Both Chief, McKeesport Police and McKeesport School Board Member and others
Not Yet Classified:
ST MORTIZ SECURITY SERVICES INC, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and on behalf of the McKeesport School District
Defendant:
ELEANOR HOSE, HOWARD HOSE, as husband and wife, THOMAS HOSE, and on behalf of both St. Moritz Security Services, Inc. and McKeesport School District and others
Tanya Kach v. St Mortiz Security Ser Inc
as 08-3921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TANYA NICOLE KACH, AKA Nikki Diane Allen
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MCKEESPORT, Both Chief, McKeesport Police and McKeesport School Board Member, E. MICHAEL ELIAS, Both Chief, McKeesport Police and McKeesport School Board Member, TOM CARTER, Both Chief, McKeesport Police and McKeesport School Board Member and others
Defendant - Dismissed_USCA:
ST MORTIZ SECURITY SER INC, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and on behalf of the McKeesport School District
Defendant:
ELEANOR HOSE, HOWARD HOSE, as husband and wife, THOMAS HOSE, and on behalf of both St. Moritz Security Services, Inc. and McKeesport School District and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
