Cases 51 - 60 of 975
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Baltimore City Police Department
as 23-6834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE CHRISTOPHER OTT, INVESTIGATOR KEITH SAVADAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Jeanette Clark
as 23-6748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEANETTE CLARK
Richardson v. Philpott, et al
as 23-7053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KERRY COHEE RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
NOLAN PHILPOTT, CHRISTOPHER ROCHELL and MUSKOGEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Suarez v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Jose Suarez
Defendant:
State of Illinois, City of Chicago, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
