Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7137
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00690
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Butts-Bey v. Schaefer et al
as 2:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Butts-Bey and ex rel Corey Lee Butts
Defendant:
George E. Schaefer, Dara Watson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly Ainsworth v. George Schaefer, III
as 21-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLY L. AINSWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HONORABLE JUDGE JEROME JAMES, THE HONORABLE JUDGE DAVID W. LANNETTI, CITY OF NORFOLK and others
Demond White v. Thurman Livingston
as 21-6072
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY JANE HALL, Norfolk Circuit Court Judge, THERESE C. MOYNIHAM, Forensic Scientist, PHILIP G. EVANS, II, Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOND ANTOINE WHITE
Lacey v. Norfolk Circuit Court et al
as 1:2020cv00978
Defendant:
Judiciary Inquiery and Review Commision and Norfolk Circuit Court
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Lacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhonda Kirschmann v. State of Virginia
as 19-2335
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT, NANCY PARR, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Chesapeake, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA KIRSCHMANN, and those similarly situated
Dupree v. Norfolk Circuit Court
as 2:2019cv00309
Petitioner:
Andre Dupree
Respondent:
Norfolk Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dupree v. Norfolk Circuit Court
as 1:2019cv00829
Petitioner:
Andre Dupree
Respondent:
Norfolk Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Butts v. Beye et al
as 1:2019cv00376
Defendant:
George E. Schaefer, Junius P. Fulton, III, Norfolk Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Butts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.