Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Lasonde v. Seabrook
as 14-2277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chandra Lasonde
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Defendant - Appellee:
Norman Seabrook, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer for the New York City Department of Correction, Elias Husamudeen, in his individual and official capacity as a Correction Officer for the New York City Department of Correction, Joseph Bracco and others
Seabrook et al v. Obama et al
as 1:2014cv04431
Plaintiff:
Norman Seabrook , The Correction Officers' Benevolent Association and The Correction Officers' Benevolent Association Security Benefits Fund
Defendant:
Barack Obama, The United States Of America, The United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03436
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Nabaya v. Seabrook et al
as 1:2014cv01526
Plaintiff:
Shapat A. Nabaya
Defendant:
Norman Seabrook and COBA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hopkins v. Union President Norman Seabrook
as 1:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Farleek Hopkins
Defendant:
Union President Norman Seabrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Seabrook
as 1:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Farleek Hopkins
Defendant:
Norman Seabrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotiere v. Seabrock
as 1:2014cv00487
Plaintiff:
McHarland Cotiere
Defendant:
Norman Seabrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chinloy v. Seabrook
as 1:2014cv00350
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chinloy
Defendant:
Norman Seabrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Seabrook
as 1:2013cv09210
Plaintiff:
Henry Brooks
Defendant:
Norman Seabrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Seabrook
as 1:2013cv08823
Plaintiff:
James Howard
Defendant:
Norman Seabrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
