Cases 11 - 20 of 63
C.C. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv09199
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Inc. and NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Plaintiff:
C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
C.C. v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00970
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK INC. and NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Plaintiff:
C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
WELLS-REYES v. NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00799
Plaintiff:
NATALIE WELLS-REYES
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LANGLEY v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
DIANNA W. LANGLEY
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, GROUP SHORT TERM DISABILITY AND LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF NOVANT HEALTH, INC., PLAN NUMBER 502 and NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-ERISA
ALLEN v. NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
KEITH VAN ALLEN
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
NOVACK v. NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
DAVID NOVACK
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
In re: NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CURRY and CHRISTINE CURRY
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
