Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HARPER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01976
Plaintiff:
IRVIN SAMUEL HARPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, KELLY HARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY et al v. O'MALLEY et al
as 2:2017cv01599
Plaintiff:
CALISIA KELLEY and JOHNNIE MAE KELLEY
Defendant:
BRIAN O'MALLEY, DOMINIC RIVOTTI, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Malley v. Sundance Vacations, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01419
Plaintiff:
Eugene O'Malley
Defendant:
Sundance Vacations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Polisky v. Times Leader Newspaper et al
as 3:2017cv01094
Plaintiff:
Fred R Polisky
Defendant:
Times Leader Newspaper, Civitas Media and James O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
FLANAGAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02648
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FLANAGAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO , SEAN O'MALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehurst v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Amir Whitehurst
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Patrick O'Malley , James Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00813
Plaintiff:
LEROY GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO , MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Reed v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2016cv02143
Plaintiff:
James Reed
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Patrick O'Malley, Jim Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. Walace et al
as 3:2016cv01722
Plaintiff:
John R. Walsh, III
Defendant:
Robert Walace, Esq., Joseph Joyce, Esq., Donald Frederickson, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fox v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2016cv01511
Plaintiff:
Tammy Fox
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Patrick O'Malley, Jim Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
