Cases 1 - 10 of 12
FRIEND EL-BEY v. DAVENPORT et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
JONATHON LARON FRIEND EL-BEY
Defendant:
PATRICK A. DAVENPORT, SUSAN S. FRYE, JAMES R. O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIPES v. LEVINSON, et al
as 1:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
NATHYL ARTILLERY SNIPES
Defendant:
DANIEL LEVINSON, STEVEN WAGNER, JAMES RODERICK O'NEILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SNIPES v. O'NEILL et al
as 1:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
NATHYL ARTILLERY SNIPES
Defendant:
JAMES RODERICK O'NEILL, DANIEL LEVINSON, SCOTT LEKAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SNIPES v. FINE et al
as 1:2017cv00912
Plaintiff:
NATHYL ARTILLERY SNIPES
Defendant:
LAWRENCE JAY FINE, DENISE SHEILA HARSFIELD, KELLY PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS, ET AL. V. STEIN, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RATIONAL SEXUAL OFFENSE LAWS , NC RSOL , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, ERIK HOOKS, ANDY WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neill v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Joanne O'Neill
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
DUNBAR v. MUNICIPALITY/CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al
as 1:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEONARD DUNBAR
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY/CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, COUNTY OF FORSYTH, WALTER MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAL v. O'NEILL et al
as 1:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
O'NEILL and OXINDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAL v. O'NEILL et al
as 1:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
O'NEILL and OXINDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE #1 et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00711
Defendant:
PAT MCCRORY, ROY A. COOPER, III, FRANK PARRISH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE #1 , JOHN DOE #2 , JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
