Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnson et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv04671
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Johnson, Jamark Johnson and Jamari Johnson
Defendant:
James Williams, Jr., Parrig Williams, Jason Louie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keefe v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jordan Keefe
Defendant:
State of Montana, MSP Ranch, D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuck's Restaurant and Bar et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020at01115
Defendant:
Attorney General Xavier Baccera, Ed Scofield, Amy Irani and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Paige, The Nevada County Restaurant Coalition, Tuck's Restaurant and Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuck's Restaurant and Bar et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv02256
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Ed Scofield, Amy Irani and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Paige, The Nevada County Restaurant Coalition, Tuck's Restaurant and Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Swafford v. Neuschmid et al
as 3:2019cv01250
Defendant:
Dr. Jason Rohrer, C/O Bucker, T. Wamble and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Swafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherod O Johnson v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv09507
Plaintiff:
Sherod O Johnson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dickson v. Angelozzi et al
as 3:2016cv01089
Defendant:
Rick Angelozzi, Bristol, C/O Elgin and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Gene Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul Awad v. Herbalife Ltd. et al
as 2:2014cv02850
Plaintiff:
Abdul Awad
Defendant:
John DeSimone, Richard Goudis, Herbalife Ltd. and others
Young et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2013cv02039
Defendant:
All Other BHU Specislist/Counselors, All Stock Holders, c/o Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
David R. Bartol, Matthew J. Cross, Robert Emery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
