Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Geiger v. Gravois Aluminum Boats L L C et al
as 6:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Sarah Geiger
Defendant:
Gravois Aluminum Boats L L C, Christopher Allard, Barka Global L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Martin v. Springfield Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01457
Defendant:
Springfield Inc, HS Produkt, d.o.o., James Devillier and others
Plaintiff:
Stuart Graham Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mildred Veliz-Osuna, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60058
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
O. O. P. V., A. L. P. V. and MILDRED LISETH VELIZ-OSUNA
Reid v. O O I D A Risk Retention Group Inc
as 6:2016cv01162
Plaintiff:
Derrick Darnell Reid
Defendant:
O O I D A Risk Retention Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mutual First, LLC v. O'Neal
as 4:2014cv00315
Plaintiff:
Mutual First, LLC
Defendant:
Patrick O. O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juan Enriquez v. W. Estelle, et al
as 10-20210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN ENRIQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
W J ESTELLE, Director Texas Department of Corrections, LESTER H BEAIRD, Warden Darrington Unit, Rosharon, TX, CHARLES AVERY, JR. and others
Vice v. Stryker Corp et al
as 2:2009cv02190
Plaintiff:
Billy Vice
Defendant:
Stryker Corp, Stryker Sales Corp, I-Flow Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Becker et al v. Wabash National Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Becker, Gregory S. Becker, Melissa A. Lambert and others
Defendant:
Wabash National Corporation, Wabash National Corporation, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and others
Third Party Defendant:
Michelle Popp
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Wabash National Corporation and Wabash National Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
