Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Newton v. City of New York
as 11-2610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alan Newton
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Mario Merola, District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity, Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, individually and in his official capacity and others
Fontana et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01497
Plaintiff:
Donna A. Fontana and Bijou Ganguly
Defendant:
The City of New York, The New York City Department Of Health and Mental Hygiene and The Office of The Chief Medical Examiner
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cameron v. Serico et al
as 1:2010cv06156
Plaintiff:
Gilbert O. Cameron
Defendant:
Louis M. Serico, Charles S. Hirsch, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Serico et al
as 1:2010cv06890
Plaintiff:
Gilbert O. Cameron
Defendant:
Louis M. Serico, Charles S. Hirsch, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirl Barkley v. Matthew Overton
as 08-2364
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SHIRL D. BARKLEY, Personal Representative of Robert Lamont Harper, Deceased and Administratix of his Estate
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW OVERTON
Defendant - None:
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, POLICE CHIEF JAMES FOX and JOHN DOE NEWPORT NEWS POLICE OFFICERS 1-5
Movant - None:
THOMAS GOYNE, Medicolegal Investigator, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Department of Health, Commonwealth of Virginia, TIMOTHY RAINES, M.D., Medical Examiner, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Department of Health, Commonwealth of Virginia and ELIZABETH KINNISON, M.D., Assistant Chief Medical Examiner, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Department of Health, Commonwealth of Virginia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv06939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
