Cases 1 - 10 of 21
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLES v. NEWSOME et al
as 7:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
QUONTERIOUS TOLES
Defendant:
LT NEWSOME and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOODY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLENDON v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EARL MCCLENDON
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, HEATHER DAVIS, LT KATRINA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01178
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Florida State Prison, Madison Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 4:2020cv00343
Defendant:
WARDEN DON DAVIS, MARK INCH, LPN HANKEASON and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michel v. Johnson et al
as 5:2019ct03389
Defendant:
Sgt. Brown, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Nobles and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Michel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREITAG v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv05750
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., CHRISTINA PENGE, LPC, STEPHAN BRAUTIGAM, PMHNP and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JOSEPH FREITAG, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Melton et al
as 5:2019ct03215
Plaintiff:
William Kimble
Defendant:
Officer Brown, Sgt. Melton and Officer Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Bureau of Prisons, Director et al
as 1:2019cv01062
Defendant:
D. J. Harmon, Officer Cobbs, Officer Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Beasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves v. Warden O'Neal et al
as 3:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Warden O'Neal and Corrections Officer Moody
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
