Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
United States of America v. Real Property located at 3124 Cherokee Road, St. Cloud, Florida 34772 et al
as 6:2022cv00205
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property located at 3124 Cherokee Road, St. Cloud, Florida 34772, Real Property located at 2132 Majestic Woods Blvd., Apopka, Florida 32712 and Scott Randolph Orange County Tax Collector
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 9070 Mayfair Pointe Drive, Orlando, FL, 32827
as 6:2020cv02209
Defendant: Real Property Located at 9070 Mayfair Pointe Drive, Orlando, FL, 32827 and Scott Randolph, Orange County Tax Collector
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
United States of America v. 3370 Briar Court, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, et al
as 1:2017cv00131
Defendant: 3370 Briar Court, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas, 8375 Homer Drive, Beaumont, Jefferson County Texas, 8690 Crestview Lane, Beaumont, Jefferson County, Texas and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. 12 Calle Pelicano, San Clemente, Orange County, California
as 1:2015cv00264
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 12 Calle Pelicano, San Clemente, Orange County, CA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Six(6) Real Properties, Located in Orange County, CA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01085
Defendant: 16142 Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana, California 92708, 16491 Peale Lane, Huntington Beach, California 92649, 16667 Bolero Lane, Huntington Beach, California 92649 and others
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 6400 ROCKY TOP DRIVE, ROUGEMONT, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al
as 1:2014cv00073
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 6400 ROCKY TOP DRIVE, ROUGEMONT, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 1973 CHEVROLET CAMARO, VIN 1S87T3N167528 and CURRENCY, $89,942.00 IN U.S.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 5015 GOVERNOR MARTIN ROAD, EFLAND, CEDAR GROVE TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al
as 1:2013cv00752
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 5015 GOVERNOR MARTIN ROAD, EFLAND, CEDAR GROVE TOWNSHIP, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 10228 OLD LIBERTY ROAD, LIBERTY, LIBERTY TOWNSHIP, RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 4599 GILMORE ROAD, LIBERTY, LIBERTY TOWNSHIP, RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1605 MOUNT WILLING RD., EFLAND, ORANGE COUNTY, NC, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
as 1:2012cv00833
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 1605 MOUNT WILLING RD., EFLAND, ORANGE COUNTY, NC, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Interested_party: STEPHEN WAYNE JOHNSON and AUDREY T. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 801 SHANNON DRIVE, CHAPEL HILL, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
as 1:2012cv00676
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 801 SHANNON DRIVE, CHAPEL HILL, ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2420 16th Street, Orange, Texas, Orange County, Including All Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements Thereon
as 1:2012cv00219
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2420 16th Street, Orange, Texas, Orange County, Including All Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements Thereon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?