Cases 11 - 20 of 40
DAVIS-HARRIS et al. v. OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2022cv07551
Plaintiff:
KHALIF DAVIS-HARRIS and AARON TUTT
Defendant:
OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Corvin v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Corvin
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. v. McDaniel
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Robin McDaniel
Not Classified By Court:
PAR Western Line Contractors LLC fka Quanta Utilities Engineering Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Timothy Tucker v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06577
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tucker
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. and Does 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. v. Smith
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Joshua N. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stallard v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02257
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stallard
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hodges v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00041
Plaintiff:
Desmond Hodges
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
