Cases 1 - 10 of 389
Maurice Owen v. United States
as 24-1887
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antonio Owen, also known as Maurice Antonio Parham
Defendant:
United States of America
Whittaker v. Owens et al
as 4:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Robert Whittaker
Defendant:
Dr. Shannon K. Owens, Dale Glass, Unknown Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Norwood et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Michael Fred Allen Lester
Defendant:
Sheriff David Norwood, Jail Administrator Cameron Owens, Shift Supervisor Amanda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04042
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen
Respondent:
Warden Reyes and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Samuel et al
as 5:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
Tommy Owens
Defendant:
Major Randall Denzer, Greg Tabor, Major Greg Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Grady v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-1094
Petitioner:
Adam Owen Grady
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Grady v. Pennington County et al
as 5:2023cv05081
Plaintiff:
Adam Owen Grady
Defendant:
Pennington County, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Ford, Jr. v. John Stanley, et al
as 23-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Owen Ford, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John Stanley, Sheriff, Lonoke County, William Robert Shipp, Administrator, Lonoke County, T. Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
