Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Burrell v. Uhler
as 26-733
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
DONALD G. UHLER, Upstate Correctional Facility, CHASE, C.O., Upstate Correctional Facility, YANDO, C.O., Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Ozborn Watts v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00031
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ozborn Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Burrell v. DOCCS
as 25-2131
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
HASTINGS, Lieutenant SPINNER, MAINVILLE and others
Burrell v. Uhler et al
as 9:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Reginald Bishop, S. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
DOCCS, Anthony Annucci, Central Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Willie James Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
David Shinn, Paul Penzone, Dori Littler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OZBORN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05100
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK OZBORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chester v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2020cv02370
Defendant:
Unknown Gonzales, Jared Ozborn, J Adam Shepherd and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Coty Chester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis Moffett v. Daviess County Detention Cente, et al
as 14-6303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEWIS FRANCIS MOFFETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVIESS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and DAVID OZBORNE, Jailer at Daviess County Detention Center
Moffett v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
Lewis Francis Moffett
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center and David Ozborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
