Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62136
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Andres Cristobal v. Nathalie Asher, et al
as 21-35169
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRES CRISTOBAL
Elsa Diaz Reyes v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-35142
Respondent / Appellee:
ELIZABETH GODFREY, Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Seattle District Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELSA DIAZ REYES
Ruachkuoth Thok v. Marcos Charles, et al
as 21-1389
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Monty Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General, United States and others
Petitioner:
Ruachkuoth Wiyual Thok
Franco v. Johnson
as 21-10141
Respondent / Appellee:
Henry Lucero, Executive Associate Director for the Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations for the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marcus Franco
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fawzi Zaya v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 20-1667
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, REBECCA ADDUCCI, in her official capacity as Detroit Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
FAWZI ZAYA and FAWZI SAMI ZAYA
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1119
Petitioner:
GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTIN AVILA LUCAS, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and JACKY CELICOURT, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of Corrections and others
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES MCHENRY, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, YOLANDA SMITH, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, LORI STREETER, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Falodun v. Barr
as 20-410
Respondent:
Walter M. Ingram, Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Post Order Custody Review Unit Chief, Washington, D.C. Field Office, Sean Callagher, Designated Field Office Director, ERO Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas E. Feeley, Deputy Field Office Director, Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations Buffalo Field Office and others
Petitioner:
Bright Idada Falodun
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1037
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, LORI STREETER, Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKY CELICOURT, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTINE AVILA LUCAS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
