Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Smith v. Tulane University of Louisiana et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Defendant:
Tulane University of Louisiana Counseling Center, Nataurean Watts, Terrence Huggins and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Amrhein v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Amrhein
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mike Gray v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 15-20674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, In His Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division Agents and Employees, As Executive Director of the Texas Department of Criminal J, SHARON FELFE HOWELL, In Her Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as General Counsel of Brad Livingston and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Division Agents and Employees, as General Counsel of the Texas Department, BETTIE LOUISE WELLS, In Her Official and Individual Capacity, Including Any Successor In Office as General Counsel of the Parole Board Presiding Officer, Members and Agents or Employees, as General Counsel and others
Lewis v. SSA, Office of General Counsel
as 9:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Paul Lewis
Defendant:
SSA, Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. OIG-Beaumont, et al;
as 2:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joe A Cook
Defendant:
OIG-Beaumont, et al
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
