Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Morant v. The Warden et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Tavis Davon Morant
Defendant:
The Warden and Officers of the Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Richardson v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK L. RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH BICK, Director of Correctional Health Care Services, individual and official capacity, JENNIFER BARRETTO, Director of Correctional Health Care Policy and Administration, individual and official capacity and others
(PC) Givens v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2019cv00017
Defendant:
N. Largoza, Marcus Smith, Office of the Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Francois P. Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michelle Brown v. Daniel Schmedhorst, et al
as 16-51150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE JEAN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL SCHMEDHORST, C/O Warden Vikki Wright, SERGEANT ALPHONSO STEVENS, LIEUTENANT DARRELL MANDIGO, C/O Warden Vikki Wright and others
Michelle Brown v. Daniel Schmedhorst, et al
as 16-50499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE JEAN BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL SCHMEDHORST, C/O Warden Vikki Wright, SERGEANT ALPHONSO STEVENS, LIEUTENANT DARRELL MANDIGO, C/O Warden Vikki Wright and others
Andrew Johnson v. Peter Hansen, et al
as 11-2810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew Russell Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Peter W. Hansen, Patrick Ingram, Attorney, Kristie Hirschman, Asst Citizen Aide/Ombudson and others
Concert v. Luzerne County Department of Corrections; et al
as 3:2008cv01352
Plaintiff:
Thomas Concert
Defendant:
Luzerne County Department of Corrections;, Facility Offices of The Warden Mr. Fiskey and Luzerne County Administrations Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
