Cases 1 - 9 of 9
REARDON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SMITH, POLICE OFFICER DOUGHERTY, SGT. RENZETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REARDON v. SIMON et al
as 1:2023cv03492
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE(S), SGT. A. L. SIMON, CHIEF LEASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEY v. YEADON POLICE OFFICER DOUGHERTY 4635 et al
as 2:2021cv03179
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN BEY
Defendant:
YEADON POLICE OFFICER DOUGHERTY 4635, SEIPLES COLLISION and YEADON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Reardon v. Zonies, et al
as 17-3551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGISTRATE ZONIES, MAGISTRATE LUONGO LAWRENCE, OFFICER DOUGHERTY and others
In re: John E. Reardon, et al
as 17-2145
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant - Respondent:
VINCENT SEGAL, RICHARD KLEIN, PAGE and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
Smith v. Ohio Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2010cv00802
Plaintiff:
William D Smith
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and Corrections Officer Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrity v. County et al
as 1:2010cv00782
Plaintiff:
Corey Merrity, Corey Merrity, Corey Merrity and others
Defendant:
Cook County, Thomas Dart, Officer Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oats v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv03661
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Oats
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Officer Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Lake County Indiana et al
as 2:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
Gameliel Cruz, Jr
Defendant:
Lake County Indiana, Lake County Indiana, Lake County Indiana Board of Commissioners of and others
Mediator:
Ronald P Kuker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
