Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Richard Blackwell v. Social Security Admin., et al
as 24-1943
Plaintiff:
Richard Preston Blackwell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Centerra, City of Saint Paul and others
Blackwell v. Social Security et al
as 0:2023cv01865
Plaintiff:
Richard Preston Blackwell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Centerra Group, LLC, City of Saint Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
PARISSE et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05730
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA PARISSE and ALFRED PARISSE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES KAPUSNIAK, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rossman v. Spota et al
as 2:2012cv00195
Defendant:
Richard Dorner, Martin Flatley, Claudette Grivaz and others
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rossman v. Spota et al
as 2:2011cv06105
Defendant:
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods et al v. Caridine, Star #13333 et al
as 1:2010cv07257
Plaintiff:
Daniel Woods and Robert Terrell
Defendant:
Chicago Police Offic Caridine, Star #13333, Chicago Police Offic Allen, Star #15090, Chicago Police Offic Ruhnke, Star #13698 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Angelic Brown v. Officer Middleton
as 08-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELIC BROWN, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Travone L Bell, decedent and TROJAN BELL, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Travone L Bell, decendent
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER MIDDLETON, Individually, OFFICER HOLT, Individually, OFFICER KRAMITZ, Individually and others
Defendant - None:
OFFICER VALENTINE, Individually, CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
