Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dennington v. Satterberg et al
as 2:2018cv01348
Defendant:
Jane Doe(s) Prosecutor(s), John Doe(s) Prosecutor(s), Ryan J. Erwin and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Jane Doe(s) and Jonathan Lawrence Dennington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liu v. New York State Department of H
as 18-964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiao Qing Liu
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew DeCagna, Doctor Abigail Hawkins, Doctor Sunil Penesti and others
Defendant:
William F. Ryan Community Health Center, NENA, Fedex Corporation, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and others
Thompson v. City of Bozeman et al
as 2:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Peter Thompson
Defendant:
City of Bozeman, Cory Clumb, Officer Jane Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borruso v. City of Port Jervis
as 14-3112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter A. Borruso
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Port Jervis, Police Officers John Doe(s), #'s 1-5, Police Officers Jane Doe(s), #'s 1-5 and others
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv03643
Plaintiff:
TRAINE SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PRICE , OFFICER JOHN DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniely v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02617
Defendant:
Police Officer Pamela Alcivar, New York City Police Officers Jane Doe(s), New York City Police Officers John Doe(s) and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenda Daniely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniely v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03381
Plaintiff:
Lorenda Daniely
Defendant:
The City of New York, Pamela Alcivar, New York City Police Officers Jane Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv03162
Plaintiff:
Sean Thomas
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Officers Jane Doe #'s 1-8 and New York City Police Officers John Doe #'s 1-8
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
