Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Iverson v. Reese et al
as 4:2020cv01269
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Miller, John Doe, Captain John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David Iverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinkler v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv01327
Plaintiff:
Freddie E. Sinkler
Defendant:
Block Officer Miller, Officer Danner, Security Robert Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Miller et al
as 1:2018cv02286
Defendant:
City of Carlisle, Officer Kenndy, Officer Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Damion G. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Miller et al
as 1:2018cv02286
Defendant:
City of Carlisle, Officer Kenndy, Officer Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Damion G. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCORMICK v. OFFICER FURDA et al
as 3:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCCORMICK
Defendant:
OFFICER FURDA, NURSE JOHNSON, NURSE AMADA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Suber, et al v. Wright, et al
as 13-1878
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONNIE SUBER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BONGAI MHLOYI and JEREMIAH MHLOYI, individually and t/d/b/a "JB'S WEB"
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WRIGHT, OFFICER KEUCH, OFFICER INGEMIE and others
RIVERA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv00235
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, TIMOTHY I. MARK and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. Brook et al
as 1:2008cv01732
Plaintiff:
Tony Blount
Defendant:
Police Officer Brook, Police Officer Miller and Lower Paxton Township Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CRAIG v. LT. BOYLAN et al
as 3:2008cv00046
Plaintiff:
DEON E. CRAIG
Defendant:
LT. BOYLAN, SUPT. ROZUM and CORR. OFFICER MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIG v. LT. BOYLAN et al
as 3:2007cv00338
Plaintiff:
DEON EMANUEL CRAIG
Defendant:
LT. BOYLAN, CORR. OFFICER MILLER and CORR. OFFICER CONN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
