Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bagwell v. Falk et al
as 2:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Austin A. Bagwell
Defendant:
Officer Peter Falk and City of Kenosha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLAME-BEY v. WYATT, et al
as 1:2019cv04721
Plaintiff:
YOHAN BIC FLAME-BEY and YOHAN FLAME
Defendant:
SPURGIN, OFFICER COCHRAN, LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Kenosha Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Bauer, Curi, Fish and others
Plaintiff:
Lathan Steven Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. Homeland Security Fusion ctr Milwaukee Wisconsin et al
as 2:2018cv01521
Defendant:
Officer Somers, Officer Peter, Milwaukee Wisconsin Fusion ctr & Employee and others
Plaintiff:
Andre O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cox et al
as 1:2017cv09299
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Chicago Police Officer Bryan Cox, Chicago Police Officer Rocco Prugar, Chicago Police Officer David Salgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAMBRELLA v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2017cv02278
Defendant:
COLLINS, OTHERS UNKNOWN, OFFICER PETERS and others
Plaintiff:
TAURUS ZAMBRELLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Peters
as 2:2016cv00920
Plaintiff:
JaQuell Jones
Defendant:
Officer Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Jones v. Clint S. Peachey, et al
as 11-3144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. PEACHEY, LT. JAEGER, OFFICER KITZMEN and others
Appleton v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv06785
Plaintiff:
Valerie Appleton and Valerie Appleton
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer Peter Fleming, Officer Perry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Peachey et al
as 2:2009cv00380
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jones
Defendant:
Lt Peachey, Lt Jaeger, Officer Kitzmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
