Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Love v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
James M Love
Defendant:
Sgt Reynolds, Lt Hintz, Officer Longridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Village of Walton Hills et al
as 1:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Amanda Mills
Defendant:
Village of Walton Hills, Stan Jaworski, Officer Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Young v. Schmidt
as 3:2022cv50267
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Jason Young
Defendant:
Officer Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Clayborne v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne
Defendant:
Dale Schmidt, Sgt Polsin, Sgt Kuehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Peng et al
as 3:2021cv01912
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
R. Peng, Detective Ellgard, Officer Kaldenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Alvarado v. Demers et al
as 2:2019cv01848
Defendant:
Property Officer Schmidt, Jane/John Doe, James Muenchow and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. Pierston et al
as 4:2019cv08039
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Mendez, Correctional Officer Gutierrez, Correctional Officer J. Gilson and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Trujillo Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smalls, Lamar v. Mcallister et al
as 3:2019cv00679
Defendant:
Renee Krueger, Paul Westerhaus, Officer Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Smalls
Not Yet Classified:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Schmidt et al
as 2:2019cv00741
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Officer Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Pierre Pickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Cook County Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv08606
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Porter
Defendant:
Sgt. Thomas and Officer Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
