Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Robertson v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Scott Kilgore, Officer Hunter Rollings, Lenn Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Scott Kilgore and Lenn Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Scott Kilgore and Lenn Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Kilgore et al
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Reginald Roderick Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Scott Kilgore, J.M. Ebert, J.M. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STODDARD v. HEILIG et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL A STODDARD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER SCOTT A HEILIG, LT SMITH, MAJOR MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinnon v. Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Deputy #1 et al
as 4:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Robert McKinnon, III
Defendant:
Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Deputy #1, Bryan County, Georgia Sheriff Sergeant Hatfield (Deputy #2), Bryan County, Georgia Superior Court Magistrate Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Lt. Watson et al
as 3:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
James Battle
Defendant:
Lt. Watson, Officer Reed, Officer Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suggs v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
Stephon W. Suggs
Defendant:
Warden Anthony Caldwell, John Doe, Cert Sgt. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nance v. Golson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Officer Scott, Officer Golson and others
Plaintiff:
Geremy Terrill Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
