Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Alexander v. Olmsted County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
Jomari E. Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
Olmsted County Jail, Olmsted County Sheriff, Olmsted County Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. Welsch et al
as 0:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Scott Meyer
Defendant:
Olmsted County Court, Hans Holland, "Kim" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Rochester Police Department et al
as 0:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Caleb Neal
Defendant:
Rochester Police Department and Olmsted County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. Olmsted County Adult Center
as 0:2021cv02454
Plaintiff:
Edward Milner
Defendant:
Olmsted County Adult Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv02437
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, All current DHS-MSOP employees, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Stehr et al
as 0:2021cv02188
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Dan Stehr, Dan Sepeda, Damascus Way and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Olmsted County Community of Corrections et al
as 0:2021cv02120
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Olmsted County Community of Corrections, Dept of Corrections Commissioner, Hearing & Release Unit Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Joyal et al
as 0:2021cv01847
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
D.H.S.-M.S.O.P, DHS-MSOP employees, Brooke Ness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Schoenfelder
as 0:2021cv01704
Plaintiff:
Derrick V Smith
Defendant:
Schoenfelder and Olmsted County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
