Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
HUGHES v. ORANGE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2009cv00899
Plaintiff:
SHAWN EDWARD HUGHES
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY JAIL, ORANGE COUNTY, UNKNOWN JAIL NURSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00692
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
BALDWIN v. ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2009cv00530
Petitioner:
GEORGE W. BALDWIN
Respondent:
ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORANGE COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD, INC. v. COUNTY OF ORANGE et al
as 1:2009cv00244
Plaintiff:
ORANGE COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD, INC.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE and F. ROJAS MONTES DE OCA, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TATE v. FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2009cv00230
Plaintiff:
JULIUS TATE
Defendant:
TREASA FRANKLIN, STRICKLAND, TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes, James Anderson-Bey, Eric Evans-El and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Cumberland County District Attorney, Cumberland County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRAVES v. ORANGE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2008cv00360
Petitioner:
SCOTTIE LEE GRAVES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORANGE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MACK v. FOX et al
as 1:2007cv00760
Plaintiff:
BENNIE AUSTIN MACK, JR.
Defendant:
CARL R. FOX, JAMES WOODALL, KENNETH C. TITUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
