Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Laughery v. County of Orange
as 8:2026cv02577
Plaintiff:
Ryan Laughery
Defendant:
County of Orange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Orange County Board of Education v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv10066
Plaintiff:
Orange County Board of Education
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Meta Payments, Inc., Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ortiz Hernandez v. County of Orange et al
as 1:2026cv07717
Pretrial Service:
County Of Orange, Sheriff Paul Arteta, Sheriff Michael Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
v. County Of Orange et al
as 7:2026cv07650
Plaintiff:
Vikki B. Stanley
Defendant:
County Of Orange, CHS EMPLOYEE GROUP LLC, JOHN AND JANE DOE #1-#10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MURRAY et al v. FRANQUIZ et al
as 6:2026cv01984
Plaintiff:
RONALD MURRAY and JASON BROWN
Defendant:
JAMES FRANQUIZ, WILLIAM PAPPAS and ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harriott v. Sherrif Of Orange County
as 6:2026cv01987
Petitioner:
Horace Victor Harriott
Respondent:
Sherrif Of Orange County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
