Cases 11 - 20 of 1,638
Tipton v. Rayford
as 24-50214
Plaintiff:
Charlton Reed Tipton
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford, Christopher Pauley, Captain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ruth E. Trice, Captain of Correctional Officers and others
United States of America v. Orozco Mendez
as 24-1685
Defendant:
ERNESTO OROZCO MENDEZ, Seal EE and Gordo
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OROZCO v. MCKINLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL et al
as 2:2024cv02557
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY OROZCO
Defendant:
MCKINLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH BERGEN BOARD OF EDUCATION and JOSEPH BARTULOVICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Orozco
as 24-1467
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN NICHOLAS OROZCO
OROZCO v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv01580
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
LILIA OROZCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Orozco v. Spears
as 1:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Jenny Orozco
Defendant:
Richard J Spears
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Adame et al v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Myrna Adame, Sidney Aguilar, Jason Albert and others
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Inc., General Dynamics Corporation, Inc., General Dynamics NASSCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Removal- Personal Injury
Orozco Navarro, et al. v. Garland
as 24-883
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH OROZCO NAVARRO, ESTEFANY GABRIELA AIFAN OROZCO and DIEGO SEBASTIAN AIFAN OROZCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Thomas et al v. Orozco-Pineda et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Randolph Thomas and Bridgette Palmatierre
Defendant:
Jorge Orozco-Pineda, Henry Lopez-Calleja, Food Haulers Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
