Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Vazquez et al v. Edouard et al
as 1:2023cv01134
Defendant:
ASHMAEL EDOUARDO, RXO EXPRESS LLC, osvaldo vasquez and others
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Vazquez and Jose A. Ramirez Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Reyes Martin et al v. 212 One Way Construction LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07985
Defendant:
Argetim Kerkuti, 212 One Way Construction LLC doing business as One Way Construction LLC, Way One Construction LLC doing business as One Way Construction LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Reyes Martin, Jose Isabel Reyes, Edgar Osvaldo Vasquez Colop and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. Vasquez-Ochoa
as 21-50928
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Osvaldo Vasquez-Ochoa, also known as Osvaldo Elozzy
Vasquez v. USADO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 15-cr-40037
as 4:2020cv40018
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Osvaldo Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Osvaldo Vasquez-Ochoa
as 17-50173
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OSVALDO VASQUEZ-OCHOA
US v. Vasquez
as 16-2317
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
OSVALDO VASQUEZ, a/k/a Chu Chu, a/k/a Anthony Christopher
Vasquez-Ochoa v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2015cv00124
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Osvaldo Vasquez-Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Muniz v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv06032
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Vasquez Muniz
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vasquez v. Gotti
as 1:2010cv00567
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Vasquez
Defendant:
John Gotti, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Fiesher
as 1:2010cv00568
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Vasquez
Defendant:
Ryan Fiesher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
