Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Brooks Jr v. States Attorney Office et al
as 1:2016cv11656
Plaintiff:
R.L. Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
States Attorney Office, Outpatient Alcohol Treatment Center, Secretary of State Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. Mitchell-Lawshea et al
as 3:2015cv03114
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes, Ronnie Brazzell, Jeffrey Hargett and others
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mitchell-Lawshea, Michael Bednarz, Danielle Walker-Low and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv10200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. Hall et al
as 1:2014cv10029
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rodriguez
Defendant:
O.B. Grayson Hall, Jr., David J. Turner, Jr. and other defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellison v. Illinois Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
Bennie K Ellison
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Corrections, Tejeda, S A Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Illinois Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv01177
Plaintiff:
Bennie K Ellison
Defendant:
Illinois Dept of Corrections, . Tejeda, S A Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Skokie School District 68 et al
as 1:2014cv00806
Defendant:
Skokie School District 68 and Other Defendants of School District 68
Plaintiff:
Michael Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker v. Jumper et al
as 3:2014cv03029
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Aimee Wilczynski, Shelly Ganz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Jumper et al
as 3:2013cv03056
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bell
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, Charlene Caraway, Judith Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. McAdory et al
as 3:2012cv03138
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bell
Defendant:
Eugene McAdory, Terry Williams and Other Defendants May be Named Upon Learning of Their Personal Involvment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
