Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Otis v. Lumpkin
as 24-40297
Petitioner:
Kerron L. Otis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Greer v. Lumpkin
as 24-50186
Petitioner:
Otis Greer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonds v. Pike County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Otis Bonds
Defendant:
Pike County, Mississippi and Warden Herbert Young
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Bickham et al
as 2:2023cv07269
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
as 2:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges, Fredericka Homberg Wicker, Susan M Chehardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
John Otis Thornton, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Regan
as 2:2023cv05985
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Regan
as 2:2023cv05600
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Regan
as 2:2023cv05402
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson vs. Kenneth
as 2:2023cv05401
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Brandon Kenneth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
