Cases 31 - 40 of 1,095
Madison v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2023cv00543
Petitioner:
Otis T. Madison
Respondent:
Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, Otis D. Wright II, Stephen V. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gibson v. Orleans Parish Criminal Court et al
as 2:2023cv03340
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Criminal Court and Judge Buckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Regan
as 2:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Regan
as 5:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Utley v. Miller
as 1:2023cv06022
Petitioner:
Otis Utley
Respondent:
Warden Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
as 3:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Otis R Mays
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, F C I Oakdale, Warden Marteneiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lake County)
as 5:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Donald Otis Williams
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Regan
as 3:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
