Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Carr v. Arbanal et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff:
Otis Carr
Defendant:
. Arbanal, . Wilham, Douglas County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 1:2024cv02680
Plaintiff:
MELODY VARGAS
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clarkson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv03777
Plaintiff:
Otis Clarkson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reichert et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2023cv15674
Plaintiff:
Lisa Reichert and Thomas Reichert
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Clong v. Henry County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
Stephen Clong
Defendant:
Henry County Sheriff's Department, Nancy Lessard, Jerrico Lessard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Otis Minnesota Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv06746
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant:
Otis Minnesota Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Hasan v. Knolmayer et al
as 1:2022cv06360
Plaintiff:
Zead Hasan
Defendant:
Officer Knolmayer, Sergent Galletti, Officer Kosik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Arrington v. Epperson et al
as 4:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
William Epperson, P. Lodge, A Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Story et al
as 1:2022cv06265
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Otis L Story and Dennis Deer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
