Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Freshwater v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00408
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Reggie Nevels and Todd Fleece
Plaintiff:
Otis Freshwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OTIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02700
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
GLEN OTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COSBY v. COOK INCORPORATED
as 1:2019cv00555
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INC, IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
MR OTIS COSBY and OTIS COSBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAMS v. JONES et al
as 2:2019cv00048
Plaintiff:
OTIS SAMS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENCASTLE, INDIANA and CHRISTOPHER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON v. SMITH
as 2:2019cv00047
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner:
OTIS JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITESELL CORPORATION v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 1:2019cv00245
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
WHITESELL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00372
Plaintiff:
Otis Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Undetermined:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ATKINSON v. SKYLINE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00491
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER and SKYLINE SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
GARY ATKINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Perez v. The Otis R. Bowen Center for Human Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez
Defendant:
Officer J. James, Officer C. Harruff, The Otis R. Bowen Center for Human Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
