Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gibbs v. Ottawa County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
John Gibbs
Defendant:
Ottawa County Board of Commissioners and Joe Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cramer v. Ottawa, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Jared Cramer
Defendant:
Ottawa, County of, Ottawa County Board of Commissioners and Joe Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Parallel Towers III, LLC et al v. Ottawa County, Kansas
as 2:2022cv02085
Plaintiff:
Parallel Towers III, LLC and Cellective Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
County of Ottawa, Kansas, Ottawa County, Kansas and Ottawa County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332 Mobile Services
WBL SPO I, LLC v. Bowen et al
as 4:2021cv00532
Plaintiff:
WBL SPO I, LLC
Defendant:
Brandy Janeal Bowen an individual doing business as Spruce Up, Kathy Bowling, Becky Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldwin County, AL v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019op45264
Plaintiff:
Jackson County Board of Commissioners, OH, Shelby County, by and through the State's Attorney of Shelby County, IL, Logan County Board of Commissioners, OH and others
Defendant:
Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Theresa Sackler and others
Petitioner:
Town of Swampscott, MA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Baldwin County, AL v. Sackler et al
as 1:2019cv02421
Defendant:
Theresa Sackler, Mortimer D A Sackler, Rhodes Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff:
Baldwin County, AL, Jackson County Board of Commissioners, OH, Shelby County, by and through the State's Attorney of Shelby County, IL and others
Petitioner:
Town of Swampscott, MA and Pasco County, FL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Newsom v. Ottawa County Board of Comm., et al
as 12-5108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. NEWSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
OTTAWA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, OTTAWA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OTTAWA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
