Cases 21 - 30 of 300
NUNEZ BRAVO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv05190
Plaintiff:
LISSETTE NUNEZ BRAVO
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH INC., MHM CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC doing business as MHM SERVICES INC. AND PARENT COMPANY CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Bechtold et al
as 4:2022cv01781
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
William Bechtold, Michelle Weller, Jeffrey Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. USA
as 2:2022cv01555
Plaintiff:
REBECCA R. OWENS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Owens v. Franzoni et al
as 4:2022cv01686
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Heather Franzoni, Ms. J. Lord, Lt. Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Donatto et al
as 4:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Donatto, Rhoades, Huey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv01687
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Chloe Walker, Amber Warick, Coran Phiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Moore v. Durand, et al
as 22-2915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. DURAND, K. OWENS, K. SORBER and others
Owens v. Deb et al
as 4:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
Christian Owens
Defendant:
Deb, Carey, Tiffany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv03411
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS D/B/A SCI PHOENIX, MR. JAMIE SORBER, MANDY SIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LLEWLYN v. KODGER
as 1:2022cv03810
Petitioner:
CHARLES LLEWLYN and OWEN ODMAN
Respondent:
DR. K. KODGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
