Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hardy Storage Company, LLC v. 5 ACRES OWNED BY CHRISTOPHER AND TRICIA VAN ORDEN (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308-37) et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Hardy Storage Company, LLC
Defendant:
5 ACRES OWNED BY CHRISTOPHER AND TRICIA VAN ORDEN (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308-37), 5 ACRES OWNED BY ERIC BODLEY AND SHERYLL POE (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308-38), 5 ACRES OWNED BY TAMMY LOVING (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308- 40); 2 ACRES OWNED BY GOKCE CAPITAL LLC (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308-45) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
White Pine Insurance Company v. Barboursville Pre-owned Auto Sales, LLC
as 3:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
White Pine Insurance Company
Defendant:
Barboursville Pre-owned Auto Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White Pine Insurance Company v. Barboursville Pre-Owned Autos Sales, LLC
as 3:2021cv00422
Plaintiff:
White Pine Insurance Company
Defendant:
Barboursville Pre-Owned Autos Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
White Pines Insurance Company v. Cole et al
as 5:2021cv00075
Defendant:
Robert Cole, Crystal Cole and Cole Farm and Auto Sales, LLC doing business as Pre-Owned Autos 4Less
Plaintiff:
White Pines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
LEGRAND et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv00115
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, HAZELTON USP PRIVATE OWN and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Martell A. LeGrand
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
White Pine Insurance Company et al v. Lovejoy et al
as 2:2020cv00376
Defendant:
Matthew Bell, Jacob Hager, State Farm Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Chaney, Affordable Pre-Owned Autos, LLC and White Pine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Travelpiece
as 3:2019cv00200
Plaintiff:
Pristine Pre-Owned Autos, Inc., Fernando M. Smith and Jamie Crabtree
Defendant:
Michael Lee Travelpiece
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. An easement to construct, operate and maintain a natural gas transmission line across 7.266 acres of land, more or less, in Putnam County, West Virginia et al
as 3:2018cv01532
Defendant:
88.04 acres of land, more or less, in Putnam County, West Virginia, owned by Scarlet Oaks Country Club (Tax Parcel ID No. 08-216-64.1), Unknown Persons and Interested Parties, An easement to construct, operate and maintain a natural gas transmission line across 7.266 acres of land, more or less, in Putnam County, West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Easements for the Storage of Natural Gas Underlying Properties in Preston County, West Virginia, 1.88 Acres Owned by Mt. Olivet Lutheran Church and the Mt. Olivet Cemetery (Parcel ID Nos. 05-14-002300 et al
as 1:2018cv00174
Defendant:
Easements for the Storage of Natural Gas Underlying Properties in Preston County, West Virginia, 1.88 Acres Owned by Mt. Olivet Lutheran Church and the Mt. Olivet Cemetery (Parcel ID Nos. 05-14-002300 and Unknown Persons and Interested Parties
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Equitrans, L.P. v. An easement to construct, use and maintain a temporary access road across properties in Marshall County, West Virginia, owned by Casandra Harmon (Parcel ID Nos. 05-19-20.1, 05-19-20.2) et al
as 5:2016cv00045
Defendant:
An easement to construct, use and maintain a temporary access road across properties in Marshall County, West Virginia, owned by Casandra Harmon (Parcel ID Nos. 05-19-20.1, 05-19-20.2) , An easement to construct, use and maintain a temporary access road across properties in Marshall Couny, West Virginia, owned by Sidney Harmon (Parcel ID Nos. 05-19-20.1, 05-19-20.3) and An easement to construct, use and maintain a temporary access road across properties in Marshall County, West Virginia, owned by John J. Ebert, Jr. (Parcel ID No. 05-19-20.1)
Plaintiff:
Equitrans, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
