Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Gates v. Allen et al
as 3:2022cv05876
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Gates
Defendant:
Trent Allen, R. Mojica, P. Lam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Pugh v. P. Lam, et al
as 20-15736
Defendant:
STEVEN THARRAT
Defendant / Appellee:
P. LAM, M.D., T. FRIEDRICHS, M.D. and YULANDA MYNHIER, Director of Health Care Policy and Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL PUGH
Jones v. Lam et al
as 3:2019cv01602
Plaintiff:
Antwion R. Jones
Defendant:
Dr. T. Zewert, S. Pesson and Dr. P. Lam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Hatton et al
as 4:2018cv05530
Defendant:
E. Viruet, J. Stout, Z. Shen and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Lam et al
as 3:2017cv06803
Plaintiff:
Darryl E. Pugh
Defendant:
P. Lam, T. Friedrichs, Steven Tharrat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. Bright et al
as 3:2017cv02034
Plaintiff:
Joel Nunez
Defendant:
D. Bright, P. Lam and T. Friederichs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brownlee v. Lam et al
as 3:2016cv07048
Plaintiff:
Terrence Brownlee
Defendant:
P. Lam, S. Posson, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv06528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lamming v. Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd. et al
as 4:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Andrew P. Lamming
Defendant:
Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd. , Prestige Maintenance USA Janitorial Supply, LLC , Sifredo E. Ramirez Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Addones Spencer v. P. Lam, et al
as 13-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Addones Spencer
Defendant - Appellee:
P. Lam, Correctional Officer, FCC - Forrest City Medium, W. Ankton, Unit Team Manager, FCC - Forrest City Medium, T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCC - Forrest City Medium and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
