Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv08102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wu et al v. MR Q's Grill House Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv04740
Plaintiff:
Li Ming Wu and Xiao Zhen Huang
Defendant:
MR Q's Grill House Inc., Grill House Inc., Jia Xiang Kitchen Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04379
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ding et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv04691
Plaintiff:
Li Ping Ding and Rockaway Food Mart Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Mei Li v. FedEx Corporation
as 2:2026cv08472
Plaintiff:
Shang Mei Li
Defendant:
FedEx Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Li, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-4926
Petitioner:
JING LI and DIANBO ZHOU
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Christian Dior Couture SA v. Lin
as 26-2080
Defendant:
XIAOLIU WANG, Li Li Wang, XINGYUN HU and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE SA and LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER
AN et al v. DESPINS et al
as 1:2026cv09045
Plaintiff:
TAO AN, CHUNGANG GUAN, CUI QINGYUN and others
Defendant:
LUC A. DESPINS and PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
