Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Weber v. P. Officer Olsen et al
as 4:2024cv04091
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Weber
Defendant:
P. Officer Olsen, Amanda, Mat Theophilus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Thola Dean Piens
Defendant:
Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
DFO, LLC v. W & P of Sioux Falls LLC
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
DFO, LLC
Defendant:
W & P of Sioux Falls LLC doing business as The Den
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Rutledge v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
James P. Rutledge
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fuller v. Howell et al
as 1:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Fuller
Defendant:
Brad Howell, Matthew Blackwelder, (FNU) Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evens v. Gilbertson et al
as 5:2022cv05057
Plaintiff:
Rachel Evens
Defendant:
David Gilbertson, Steven R. Jensen, Janine M. Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Parker v. Yankton Camp et al
as 4:2021cv04001
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Beatty, Warden J. Cox, Yankton Camp and others
Plaintiff:
Handsome P. Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parker v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2020cv04166
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Cox and Yankton Camp
Plaintiff:
Handsome P. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laber v. Saul
as 5:2020cv05051
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Nicholas P. Laber
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
