Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cardenas v. Davis
as 5:2026cv01917
Petitioner:
Gerardo Cardenas
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cardenas v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2026cv07623
Plaintiff:
Carlos A Cardenas
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Alameda County Jail and Alameda County Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas v. VW Dig LLC et al
as 2:2026cv05141
Plaintiff:
Miguel Cardenas
Defendant:
VW Dig LLC, Justin Stephen Naylor and Shellee G Naylor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mendoza Cardenas v. Blanche
as 26-4637
Petitioner:
BERNARDO MENDOZA CARDENAS
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez Estrada, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-4619
Petitioner:
JOSE MARIA GONZALEZ ESTRADA, EMYLIN DE LEON CARDENAS and JOSE ROLANDO GONZALEZ DE LEON
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cardenas v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 3:2026cv07315
Plaintiff:
Sandra Valencia Cardenas
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Winston v. Rojas et al
as 5:2026cv07261
Plaintiff:
Myoho Mystic Winston
Defendant:
Cynthia Rojas, Bayade Omosaiye, Salvador Siordia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
